How does the legal authority of a security officer compare to that of law enforcement?

The statement that security officers have limited authority compared to law enforcement is accurate because the roles and powers of security officers are typically defined by the employer and are generally more restricted than those of law enforcement officers. Security officers primarily serve to protect property and maintain order within a specific area, such as a business or event, and their authority is dependent on the company's policies and the laws of the state.

Law enforcement officers, such as police officers, possess broader powers granted by law. They can make arrests, carry firearms, perform searches, and enforce laws on a broader scale. Moreover, law enforcement has the authority to respond to criminal activities and emergencies in public spaces, whereas security officers usually focus on preventative measures and responding to incidents within their assigned locations.

While security officers can detain individuals for trespassing or other violations within their jurisdiction, their actions must fall within the limitations set by law and often require law enforcement to take further legal action. This delineation of powers underscores the limited legal authority of security officers in comparison to overall law enforcement.